Hi,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> It does *not* FTBFS on Debian Sid or Etch, so it is a wishlist bug
> for Debian which, of course, I am willing to fix
Sure.
> > Aurélien, would you be so kind to suggest this upstream?
> No, upstream is not active anymore and does not care. Is it also my
> fault? Come on, please...
Please don't try to read me wrong. If anywhere, the fix belongs
upstream; I didn't knew upstream was dead, and I don't know hfsplus'
upstream, so I suggested you might forward it (instead of, say, me).
If it's dead, I suppose it makes you upstream for it, and it's nice you
could merge this.
> > (I'm noting this here in case Aurélien didn't read my reply on IRC.)
> Again, adhominem stuff... Like if I never answered people on
> IRC... Like if I did not maintain my packages... Instead of bashing
> me like the evil NM which I am not, would you be so kind to sponsor
> this upcoming upload? ;)
Please don't try to read me wrong. I noted this here because I wanted
my efforts to counter-verify your claims to be documented and not
wasted, so that other persons don't have to do it again, and to get
fact straights. I never said you don't reply on IRC, but you didn't
seem to be very open-minded with this bug report to begin with, so I
feared this bug might sleep needlessly.
It seems your upload doesn't need sponsoring anymore, but I would have
sponsored it, of course.
Thanks for applying the patch,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
