reopen 367670 thanks On 10/19/06, Dmitry Borodaenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/06, Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 09:35:07AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > * Subversion snapshot of RedCloth 3.1. > > [...] > > - removed fix for (_), as it breaks more important test cases > > With this fix removed, I think we need to reopen #367670.Yes, please :) > By the way, I removed the :limit option again for _ and only one, > seemingly completely unrelated test fails: > > code.yml: > .x.......10.... > --- > in: > "This is an empty dictionary: ==```=={}==```==" > out: > "<p>This is an empty dictionary: > XXXpreformatted<em>backticksXXX{}XXXpreformatted</em>backticksXXX</p>"expected: > "<p>This is an empty dictionary: ```{}```</p>" > diff: > XXXpreformatted<em>backticksXXX{}XXXpreformatted</em>backticksXXX</p> > --- > > A very odd result IMO. Yes, that's the one that failed for me, too. Breaking notextile markers seems like normal priority bug for me, while multiline _ is more of a wishlist, that's why I backed it out. If I could make more sense of RedCloth code, I would try to track this down and make both work, but I don't have enough time for it right now :(
(...) -- Dmitry Borodaenko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
