Jon Dowland wrote: >> Any reason you can't just depend on fastjar? > > That's what I am doing, right now. But, if a user has another jar > implementation installed, it's not ideal to force them to install > fastjar rather than use their preferred one.
You said it was a build-dep. There is nothing wrong with forcing a user to install fastjar in order to build the package. Normal users don't build packages anyway. Please close this bug, and don't introduce an unnecessary virtual package. Marcus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
