On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 05:18:39PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > severity 393300 important > > Bug#393300: preinst script bug > > Severity set to `important' from `normal' > > Rationale? :-)
Well, I thought it was obvious... :) 1/ The maintainer did not test the upgrade path of his package. 2/ It confuses the user who might think something is broken. Trust is everything. ;) 3/ It must be fixed ASAP and not be let to rot like a normal bug. Important for a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone. I think it matches in that case. Feel free to do otherwise, I will not engage myself in a flamewar on the BTS for such a trivial matter. ;) Cheers, -- .''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME : :' : `. `'` Free Software Developer `- Unix Sys & Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
