Le jeu 12 octobre 2006 20:14, Cameron Dale a écrit : > On 10/12/06, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le jeu 12 octobre 2006 07:45, Cameron Dale a écrit : > > > Section 3.1: Programs that can run with any version of Python > > > must begin with #!/usr/bin/python or #!/usr/bin/env python (the > > > former is preferred). They must also specify a dependency on > > > python, with a versioned dependency if necessary. > > > > that dependency is implied by the python-support dependency, so > > it's ugly, but exists, hence the important severity, not the > > serious one. > > By my understanding, this is not correct, as the dependency on Python > must be direct. Please see this thread: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2006/08/msg00100.html > > Especially where it says: > > python-support is a package that, at least according to its long > description, says that it provides a script that byte-compiles Python > modules. Nothing in the description of the package says that it > provides a Python interpreter.
sigh, it is not *good* but it's not a grave violation as the packages still work as intended. avoid to put critical bugs that would disturb the migration of a package that technically works even if it could be conceptually better. Also note that bugs wrt the new python policy are not RC for packages in etch (only packages already with other RC and/or not in etch have RC bugs for that policy). thanks. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpk3HAzH2LlU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
