At Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:55:52 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:33:49 +0900 (JST) > Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A. Send a patch to fontconfig maintainer, > > to add "VL Gothic" (and prefer than Kochi Gothic) to > > /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-nonlatin.conf. > > B. Let ttf-vlgothic package has /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-ttf-vlgothic.conf > > like: > > Plan B is easier than A, but is it OK to ttf-vlgothic package put
I think so too. > its config file to /etc/fonts/* directory? How do other packages handle > that (no conflict)? I believe it's quite safe to put this file to /etc/fonts/conf.d because this filename is unique and Suggests:fontconfig tells enough what it is. Although there are only few packages to put file on /etc/fonts/conf.d at this time (maybe fontconfig has already the definition for most fonts), ttf-arphic-ukai puts its configuration to /etc/fonts/conf.d/ttf-arphic-ukai. I recommend to use the name 64-*, because the primary of a font family is chosen from first <prefer> element. For example if you put file as 65-ttf-vlgothic.conf or ttf-vlgothic.conf, Kochi-Gothic will be chosen by prior 65-nonlatin.conf. Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
