Hi, Frank Küster [2006-09-26 20:00 +0200]: > Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is actually a bug in latex-ucs-doc not in tex-common which has been > > reported (#388376 and #388407) before. It is fixed in latex-ucs > > 20041017-6. If I interpret latex-ucs's changelog correctly, this problem > > was introduced in version 20041017-4 uploaded on 2006-09-10. Matrin, is > > that correct?
Correct. > > I am not sure if we need a versioned conflict or replace > > to cover such a case. Other oppinions? > > I don't think we need to bother about that, it would only clutter the > control file. Etch won't release without that RC bug open, and I hope a > possible new tex-common upload won't reach etch before latex-ucs does. I agree. > In other words, I assume Martin has set a proper urgency? I erroneously thought that the fixed version didn't reach Etch yet, thus I uploaded with normal urgency. However, I asked Steve Langasek to push it, so it will go in after 2 days in tomorrow's britney run. Sorry for that silly bug. On upgrades the directory is not replaced with a symlink, so I did not notice. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
