Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please consider one of the following options: > > - move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback > is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked > in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed, > this is indeed not a very strong drawback > > - move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be > reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file > is only displayed when users upgrade the package > > - change the template type to "error" in case this note is meant to be > displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of > the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details > > - raise the priority to "high". This should be the last option to consider. > It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you > display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT > if not reading the note. > [...] > > Template(s) identified in your package: > > tetex-bin -- config:44 tetex-bin/cnf_name
This is called as follows: ,---- | # suggest a user to rename old cnf files (copyright Atsuhito?) | # (upgrade from woody, keep for etch?) | if [ -d /etc/texmf/texmf.d ]; then | if ls /etc/texmf/texmf.d 2> /dev/null | egrep -vq '(\.cnf|\.dpkg-.*|~)$'; then | db_input medium tetex-bin/cnf_name || true | db_go || true | fi | fi `---- As you can see, I already questioned whether this is still needed for etch. I have added a remark to README.Debian.sgml and removed it from the config script. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
