Quoting Julien BLACHE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Could you give more details about this so that further checks can
> > easily avoid pointing again to mcelog? Details would help Thomas
> > Huriaux to improve his scripts.
> 
> I'm using the note to warn the admin when mcelog is not usable on the
> machine. I don't really care whether the note is displayed or not,
> because in the latter case the admin will get a mail, which is even
> better.

Seems to be a good use case for the "error" template type, indeed, as
I try to explain in the bug report..:-)

Also check whether the note is indeed *really* mailed. IIRC, JOeyh
Hess mentioend in the small thread we had on -devel that such feature
is no more enabled in debconf (or maybe only for "critical" priority
questions).



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to