--- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
["public use"]
> Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it.
> "public use" does not mean "use in public", in means "use by the
> public" -- i.e., "use by anyone".
I don't know if it is clear enough, at least for a non-native English
speaker (me). Bug 321178 also suggests it should be worded better.
> If this was the only problematic clause, I agree there's no
> problem here. I assumed, based on the bug report you submitted,
> that there was an issue with the license not permitting
> /modification and distribution/, rather than use.
Well, I submitted it as "serious", and justified by Policy 2.3, because
the copyright file stated itself as a "work in progress", and 3270 was
removed before because of licensing issues (although some of them not
relevant anymore). But, if there's no problem, sorry for the noise.
Thanks,
Wagner
_______________________________________________________
Você quer respostas para suas perguntas? Ou você sabe muito e quer compartilhar
seu conhecimento? Experimente o Yahoo! Respostas !
http://br.answers.yahoo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
