Hi, I just received a clarification of the license of Haskell-Edison. Upstream will adjust the README and the Licence headers in the source files in the next release.
The license of haskell-edison is the MIT license as stated in the COPYRIGHT file. Greetings Arjan
--- Begin Message ---On Thursday 21 September 2006 16:11, you wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get the Edison library into the Debian archive[1] Excellent! > and > during that process some question arose about the license of Edison. The > README file states > > "Edison is released under a BSD3 style license. See the COPYRIGHT > file for details." > > and the source files state > > "License : BSD3; see COPYRIGHT file for terms and conditions" > > But if I look at the COPYRIGHT file it contains the MIT license [2] > instead of the BSD3 license [3]. > > This means that either the COPYRIGHT file is wrong ore the License > statements in the source files and the README. I guess the wrong license > was pasted in COPYRIGHT, but I do need clarification before the package > can be included into Debian. Ugh. I see I did not pay sufficient attention to the actual license wording. It is indeed the MIT license (as originally licenced by Dr. Okasaki), and the text of the COPYRIGHT file is correct. My classification of it as a BSD3 license, is therefore incorrect. Sorry for the confusion. I'll get this straightened out for the next release. In the meantime, the text of the COPYRIGHT file is the correct license. > Greetings Arjan > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=382184 > [2] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php > [3] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php -- Rob Dockins Talk softly and drive a Sherman tank. Laugh hard, it's a long way to the bank. -- TMBG
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
