On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:25:33PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Package: menu > Version: 2.1.29, 2.1.24 > Severity: normal
Hello Frank, > The output of "update-menus -v" and "update-menus -d" is identical. This is currently the case, yes. > According to the manual page, this is not intended. The manpage does not mandate -d to be useful actually. The option -v is to debug the menu system and -d to debug the update-menus program. Therefore what does -d should be left to the developers to decide (and one of them proposed to remove -d completly so we reached this middleground). > What I would like from the debug option is information about menu files > that do not lead to creation of a menu entry, e.g. because the package > is not installed or there is an error in the file. Errors in the file are already reported. I will try to add a verbose output when files are discarded due to package check. Would that be sufficient ? Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
