On Wed, 06 Sep 2006, martin f krafft wrote: > > Also, may I humbly suggest naming the new package sysvinit-utils > > instead of sysvutils? > > Well, except that this would be a divergance from Ubuntu, but on the > other hand, there's no reason why the Ubuntu package cannot depend > on sysvutils|sysvinit-utils
If I may be so humble, we don't have to follow Ubuntu 100%. The same way that the Debian team is happy to work to bring enhancements from Ubuntu to Debian, I assume that the Ubuntu team will be happy to deal with the minor adjustments we do in the process. > Otherwise I agree, sysvinit-utils is better. So let's please go with it. It will not be difficult for Ubuntu to transition to sysvinit-utils either, nor will it be difficult for them to deal with both. Now, that said, we seem to have found a dpkg bug. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
