Hello!
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 18:50:40 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> ATM the patch is quite dirty, because it uses grep and the BASH
> parameter substitution to assign the value, while the same function
> should be very simple as:
>
> check_lisp_variable () {
> test -r /etc/cl-launchrc && . /etc/cl-launchrc
> test -r "$HOME/.cl-launchrc" && . "$HOME/.cl-launchrc"
> test -n ${SOFTWARE_SYSTEM} && LISP=${SOFTWARE_SYSTEM}
> }
>
> The last line is obviously fault, what I'd like to do is:It was quite simple, just putting two ! (and I'd like to thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] for his support). The attached patch is tested on cl-launch_1.85-1, but it's generated against cl-launch_1.86 as at [1]. Comments? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://fare.tunes.org/files/cl-launch/
--- cl-launch.sh_1.86 2006-08-17 10:55:45.000000000 +0200
+++ cl-launch.sh 2006-08-29 22:19:11.000000000 +0200
@@ -1642,7 +1642,13 @@
LAUNCH_FORM="(progn${MAYBE_PACKAGE_FORM}${HASH_BANG_FORM}${LAUNCH_FORMS})"
exec $LISP_BIN $IMAGE_OPT $IMAGE $OPTIONS $EVAL "$LAUNCH_FORM" $ENDARGS "$@"
}
+check_lisp_variable () {
+ test -r /etc/cl-launchrc && . /etc/cl-launchrc
+ test -r "$HOME/.cl-launchrc" && . "$HOME/.cl-launchrc"
+ test -n ${!SOFTWARE_SYSTEM} && LISP=${!SOFTWARE_SYSTEM}
+}
launch_self () {
+ check_lisp_variable
LAUNCH_FORMS="$(load_form "$PROG")"
try_all_lisps "$@"
}
pgpuEjfWJKhoN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
