On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 15:03 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > The second one is the main reason for the bug report. I think it is > alright to have a mostly empty libgl1-mesa-dri package as this package > does not seem to have any serious reverse depends outside of x.org. > Again, just not building it would probably also be a solution.
Yeah, the whole purpose of the package is DRI support after all. > This is the upstream part of the patch, which looks good to me. Michel, > do you think this is reasonable to submit upstream? Worth an attempt I think, although it may be desirable to take configs/linux-indirect into account. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
