[ please keep the bug in the Cc ] Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 16. August 2006 16:17 schrieben Sie: > > That's also why I didn't do #321876.. Well, we probably could do a > > openoffice.org1-dtds, > > but I doubt its sense ;-) > > As a matter of fact I ran into the following problem: > > I write/translate/... books in a custom ultra-light XML format which I > transform into OOo 1 XML with XSLT scripts so my editor can check set / > have them typeset / ... > > I wanted to show off about this to a friend who had an AMD 64 and my > program would not run because it couldn't check the produced XML file > against the officiel OOo DTD (of course, I could have deactivated that > check). Yes, but the point is, whatever you checked against was *not* the official OOo2 DTD. It's the 1.1.x file format. Not OD. And would you like a openoffice.org1-dtds (note the 1!) package. I don't really... > He told me it was still difficult to install OOo on his architecture. So well, openoffice.org, yes. But not openoffice.org-common :) > I told him we don't need the full OOo stuff, just the DTDs... and > discovered it was not (easily) available for him. It still isn't, either. Unless you really want to validate against the 1.1.x format. > > I'll look whether I can add the OD DTD... Doesn't look that easy.. I'll ask upstream.. Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
