severity 293556 grave thanks It just did it again. I am thus making the bug RC.
Also see:
< madduck> so losing pubring.pgp is data loss, right?
< weasel> .oO( no, it's normal gnupg behaviour )
< kink> you could consider it to be only a cache
< weasel> kink: no.
< weasel> or well, you could. but you'ld be wrong :)
< kink> as usual
< madduck> so would that make #293556 RC?
< noshadow> madduck: can you create a reproduceable test-case?
< madduck> noshadow: no, but that's not a requirement. i've seen the
bug at least a dozen times in the last few weeks.
< noshadow> It's not a requirement for RC, but that it is in gpg and
not somewhere else...
< madduck> what else touches pubring.pgp?
< madduck> i mean, the bug includes mention of XFS, which, as readers
of the planet know, is *not* what i am using anymore.
< noshadow> filesystem, memory, dma, harddisc...
< madduck> noshadow: i've seen it on several different machines and in
different settings, and i am not the only one, so it's
highly unlikely that it's hardware
< madduck> there, happened again. zero-sized pubring.pgp
* madduck makes #293556 RC
< mrvn> madduck: can you starce whatever you did to cause it from now
on?
< madduck> mh, i guess i'll set mutt to run strace instead of gpg.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
