Le mercredi 09 août 2006 à 20:53 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit : > Let me rephrase point 5); wherever we ship the doc, we have to put list > it in /usr/share/gtk-doc/html to not break expectations, so why move it > at all?
I was about to answer "because of the policy", but by reading it I have
to admit you are right.
§12.3:
Any files that are referenced by programs but are also useful as
stand alone documentation should be installed
under /usr/share/package/ with symbolic links
from /usr/share/doc/package.
Therefore /usr/share/gtk-doc/html makes perfect sense.
> While thinking about this I thought about a new potential proble for
> the move:
> 6) Some tools might not handle symlinks in /usr/share/gtk-doc very well
> (devhelp springs to mind), while we currently have no special tool that
> goes over /usr/share/doc/.
Of course we have: dhelp and dwww. Some GNOME doc packages are already
shipping doc-base files, but this is also something that should be
generalized.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
