Christoph Biedl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you agree: > * In postinst: Check whether /e/n/i permissions are 660 or tighter and > offer to fix them if required.
I don't really agree here, as I don't see the necessity to bug the user with an additional question. Instead, we should answer the question for the user. Unfortunately, /e/n/i is not the business of wpasupplicant, but of ifupdown. > * If wpasupplicant reads credentials from /e/n/i and finds loose > permissions: Print a warning message on the console or at least via > syslog. We could implement such a check in ifupdown.sh, but I don't think its worth the trouble. Kel, how do you think? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
