On 2005-03-07T09:20:53+0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Here is the response that I received from the upstream author. > > ========================================= > Kapil, > > Ideally, I wouldn't split any of these ligatures. The mapping applies > to the ligatures that currently don't get supported on MSIE. In fact, > the only reason for the mozilla and ooffice branches is to take care > of deficiencies in current state of browsers. > > ========================================= > > Please let me know if you think this does not answer your query.
Hello,
I don't feel very strongly about this issue, so please feel free to not
change anything. But I am a bit confused about the upstream author's
reply. I just tried the ligatures in Firefox (1.0.1), and it seems that
none of the ligatures from &#FB00; to &#FB04; is supported. Doesn't
this mean that all of these ligatures, including fi and fl,
should be included in
> > /usr/share/texmf/tex4ht/ht-fonts/mozilla/charset/unicode.4hf
> > /usr/share/texmf/tex4ht/ht-fonts/mozilla/charset/mnemonic/unicode.4hf
?
> In principle, it *is* possible for you to keep your own versions
> of .4hf files by defining the environment variable
> TEX4HTFONTSETS
> but I realise that this may be painful.
Thanks for the tip.
Ken
--
Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig
Dude or his dudeness or el duderino
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
