Hello all, > In other words, if distributing the jar 'svn-javahl.jar', the package > should be named 'libsvn-javahl-java'. Though I can't help but wondering > about the value of the javahl part of the package name.
I really doubt that this issue is release critical. I've looked through this file: http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt and there's nothing in there that would qualify the package as unsuitable for release. While I can understand that it's good if the package names are all according to some specified scheme, I don't think that the wrong name makes the package in such a broken state that we should prevent it from being released. I therefore propose to lower the severity to important. It should still be fixed of course. Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
