Control: tags 1143401 + patch Control: tags 1143401 + pending Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ruby-pgplot (versioned as 0.2.0-5.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian
diffstat for ruby-pgplot-0.2.0 ruby-pgplot-0.2.0 changelog | 7 +++++++ patches/no-has_rdoc.patch | 13 +++++++++++++ patches/series | 1 + 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff -Nru ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/changelog ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/changelog --- ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/changelog 2024-05-29 06:17:21.000000000 +0300 +++ ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/changelog 2026-08-31 16:17:55.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +ruby-pgplot (0.2.0-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS with recent rubygems. (Closes: #1143401) + + -- Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:17:55 +0300 + ruby-pgplot (0.2.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0 (no changes needed) diff -Nru ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/patches/no-has_rdoc.patch ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/patches/no-has_rdoc.patch --- ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/patches/no-has_rdoc.patch 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200 +++ ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/patches/no-has_rdoc.patch 2026-08-31 16:17:55.000000000 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +Description: Fix FTBFS with recent rubygems +Author: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> +Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1143401 + +--- ruby-pgplot-0.2.0.orig/pgplot.gemspec ++++ ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/pgplot.gemspec +@@ -56,6 +56,4 @@ PGPLOT_GEMSPEC = Gem::Specification.new + --exclude .*\.o + --exclude pgplot\.so + ] +- s.has_rdoc = true +- s.extra_rdoc_files = %w[README README.ja FuncUsage ext/rb_pgplot.c] + end diff -Nru ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/patches/series ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/patches/series --- ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/patches/series 2024-05-29 06:04:25.000000000 +0300 +++ ruby-pgplot-0.2.0/debian/patches/series 2026-08-31 16:17:55.000000000 +0300 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ 0001-Make-package-reproducible.patch +no-has_rdoc.patch
