On Tue, Aug 4, 2026, at 11:44 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi, > > On 25/07/2026 10:38, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026, at 7:25 PM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026, at 6:35 PM, Andres Salomon wrote: >>>> On 7/24/26 11:39, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026, at 7:04 PM, Andres Salomon wrote: >>>>>> On 7/6/26 14:37, Andres Salomon wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> [...] >>>>>> Okay, that took a little longer than expected because building chromium >>>>>> on trixie with llvm-toolchain-22 broke (related to trixie's older >>>>>> bindgen), but we have a workaround for chromium and I was able to test >>>>>> chromium builds with this new ~deb13u2 package. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've attached the full debdiff between sid's version and this backport, >>>>>> but the only non-changelog difference between ~deb13u1 and ~deb13u2 is >>>>>> the bit at the end: >>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> it would probably be good if we could wait for this MR to land: >>>>> >>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/-/merge_requests/224 >>>>> >>>>> to avoid the need for another bump for rustc(-web)? >>>> >>>> >>>> Ah jeez - if that were a smaller commit, I'd just cherry-pick it and >>>> roll a ~deb13u3. Given the size though, I'll wait for the llvm packages >>>> to pick it up and migrate to forky. >>> >>> FWIW, the actual change is the first small hunk, the rest is testsuite >>> changes that I don't think the Debian build even runs. Let me >>> double-check and verify (and minimize accordingly). >> >> updated MR (original one got merged already) opened, since what I wrote >> above holds. >> >>>> Mike & Emilio, are you good with another 2-4 week delay for the llvm >>>> backoprt? >>>> >>>> Also in the meantime, I'd appreciate testing of the current packages: >>>> >>>> https://people.debian.org/~dilinger/llvm22/ >>>> >>>> You can grab the orig from sid/forky if you want to rebuild, I'm on a >>>> train right now and don't have very good wifi. I've only tested it >>>> building chromium, so builds of firefox or rustc would help shake out >>>> any additional changes we might need to make. >>> >>> I can give them a spin to build a dlstage0 backport of rustc 1.96 from >>> experimental (the earlier versions are still on LLVM 21) over the >>> weekend. >> >> rustc 1.96.1 from experimental (with a slight adaptation to match >> trixie's libgit2, and the `pkg.rustc.dlstage0` (no 1.95 in trixie yet) >> and `nowasm` (lack of wasm-tools) build profiles works as expected with >> your current test packages. > > Do you have test packages or a .dsc somewhere?
put a test build of rustc 1.96.0 with nowasm,pkg.rustc.dlstage0 and Andres' LLVM 22 packages here: https://people.debian.org/~fabiang/rustc-trixie-llvm-22/
