tags 37694 + pending
thanks
Ok, so here is the bug status update I mentioned. Thanks again for the
report. This should make the package better.
Dirk
On 6 July 2006 at 14:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:53:07AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
| > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:58 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > > On 5 July 2006 at 18:42, Ross Boylan wrote:
| > > | On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 07:59:58PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > [..]
| > >
| > > | I have another system; I'm not sure if the html is installed there.
| > >
| > > Err, how about asking 'dpkg -s r-doc-html' ? Wouldn't that tell you?
| > Yes; I just wasn't on the system.
| > >
| > > | If it is, would manually deleting the "manual" link before upgrade be
| > > | sufficient to get things to work smoothly?
| > >
| > > I hope so as the suggested fix is trying to the same :) Why don't you
test
| > > it manually if you have other system with a similar setup, or can recreate
| > > your setup?
| > The other system doesn't have r-doc-html installed. What version do I
| > need to test it? stable?
|
| I don't know. I tend to run only unstable/testing so I have more or less
| forgotten when and how this changed. But the changelog documents it.
|
| If you can't test it, we simply won't test it.
|
| Sorry, Dirk
|
| --
| Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
| -- Thomas A. Edison
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
