Le mardi 07 avril 2026 à 12:20 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit : > Le mardi 07 avril 2026 à 11:44 +0200, Santiago Vila a écrit : > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 11:31:39AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 11:27:53AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > > > Great! I've just clicked on the giveback button in buildd.debian.org. > > > > > > Too soon for that to work, I guess. Will try again in a few hours. > > > > No, it was not too soon. I can see in the build log that all three: > > > > ∙ Missing build on armhf > > ∙ Missing build on ppc64el > > ∙ Missing build on s390x > > > > were tried this time with openblas 0.3.32+ds-3 from incoming. > > > > This time ppc64el finally worked, but not the other two (armhf and s390x). > > > > Can someone take a look at this? > > It’s a similar issue as the ppc64el one, I’ve reported it upstream: > https://github.com/OpenMathLib/OpenBLAS/issues/5747 > > The loong64 issue has already been fixed upstream. > > I will backport the fix to unstable once available.
I have uploaded openblas 0.3.32+ds-4 which should hopefully fix this. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
