On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 11:43:50PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>I want to repeat that your rationale for using an older compiler does 
>not match well with reality.
>
>When Matthias does gcc (or openjdk) uploads to unstable, this tends to 
>happen in a batch of half a dozen versions.
>
>Number of uploads to unstable during Q1 2026:
>4x gcc-11
>3x gcc-12
>6x gcc-13
>4x gcc-14
>4x gcc-15
>4x gcc-16[1]
>
>A point could be made that newer versions contain more changes,
>but every version is a moving target - especially >= 13 where
>unstable gets updates from the maintained upstream stable branch
>1-2 times per month.

ACK, fair enough - thanks for the data! I guess I've just been lucky
in the past. :-(

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                [email protected]
The two hard things in computing:
 * naming things
 * cache invalidation
 * off-by-one errors                  -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen

Reply via email to