Control: tags -1 = confirmed On 2026-03-01 19:38:05 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: block -1 by 1129225 > > On 2026-02-28 22:12:19 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: block -1 by 1125701 > > > > On 2026-02-21 12:35:53 +0100, Patrick Franz wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > > > > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > > > Am Freitag, 13. Februar 2026, 10:51:04 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit > > > schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > > > [...] > > > > > I have not done any rebuilds yet, but if you create the transition > > > > > page, it'll me which packages need to be rebuild and crucially in > > > > > which order. > > > > The transition page should appear with the next run of ben. > > > > > > > > > Once I've done those rebuilds, I'll get back to you. > > > > > > > > Adding the moreinfo tag for now. Please remove it once the rebuilds > > > > have been done. > > > > > > I've done all rebuilds now and it looks like this: > > > > > > Many packages actually failed to build and we've managed to fix some of > > > those already. > > > > > > Almost 10 packages still FTBFS due to changes in Qt's build system (if > > > you link against private targets, you now have to find them explicitly in > > > CMake). I filed bugs against of all them but it may be time to raise the > > > severity to serious. Most of these bugs should be relatively easy to fix > > > and for a number of those, there is an upstream fix available. > > > > > > A further 5-6 packages FTBFS due to a packaging change in Qt 6.10. All > > > but one of those are maintained in our team, so we can take care of them > > > ourselves. The fix is absolutely trivial but cannot be done until Qt 6.10 > > > arrives in unstable. > > > > > > 2 packages or so fail for different reasons, but bugs have been filed as > > > well. > > > > As this is a lock-step migration, we will need the onnxruntime > > transition to finish first. > > kaidan also will need to be handled. Adding also as a blocking bug.
Go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
