On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Marc Haber > | One would have to chown 701 /tmp/user/0. Would that open a too big > | security hole in your opinion? > > I'd be somewhat unconfortable with it -- the point of pam-tmpdir is to > have a completely private $TMP.
I understand that. >It's probably not a security problem, > though, as in it'll still be better than using /tmp as $TMP{,DIR}. Is there any better possibility to solve the issue at hand? Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]