On Jun 30, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This sentence does not make sense to me. The missing POT file is by > design? So translators are supposed to ask you for a current POT? > (Yes, *I* know most of the 8392432 different ways of building a POT > file from upstream sources, but translators most often don't.) Right, I *tought* it was already included. I will add it in the next release.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
