Control: tags 1096321 + patch Control: tags 1096321 + pending Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for apt-dater (versioned as 1.0.4-8.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian
diffstat for apt-dater-1.0.4 apt-dater-1.0.4 changelog | 7 +++++++ patches/gcc-15.patch | 15 +++++++++++++++ patches/series | 1 + 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) diff -Nru apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/changelog apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/changelog --- apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/changelog 2023-08-17 14:29:08.000000000 +0300 +++ apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/changelog 2025-09-19 21:54:30.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +apt-dater (1.0.4-8.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS with GCC 15. (Closes: #1096321) + + -- Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Sep 2025 21:54:30 +0300 + apt-dater (1.0.4-8) unstable; urgency=medium * Remove obsolete NEWS file. diff -Nru apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/patches/gcc-15.patch apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/patches/gcc-15.patch --- apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/patches/gcc-15.patch 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200 +++ apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/patches/gcc-15.patch 2025-09-19 21:54:30.000000000 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +Description: Fix FTBFS with GCC 15 +Author: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> +Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1096321 + +--- apt-dater-1.0.4.orig/src/sighandler.c ++++ apt-dater-1.0.4/src/sighandler.c +@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static RETSIGTYPE sigintSigHandler(int s + } + + +-static RETSIGTYPE sigtermSigHandler() { ++static RETSIGTYPE sigtermSigHandler(int sig) { + cleanUI(); + refreshUI(); + g_main_loop_quit (loop); diff -Nru apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/patches/series apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/patches/series --- apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/patches/series 2023-08-17 14:29:08.000000000 +0300 +++ apt-dater-1.0.4/debian/patches/series 2025-09-19 21:54:30.000000000 +0300 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ 01-tmux-options.diff +gcc-15.patch
