> Is [1] *also* necessary (that's #1115352, you uploaded it to Ubuntu > but > not to Debian) or is it sufficient to have [1] || [2]?
No, [2] is good enough. [2] is the actual fix for cinnamon (only), but [1] is wider (as it covers also extensions). > I thought there had been discussion about needing to rebuild > gnome-shell > against the new GLib, and I wasn't sure whether that applied equally > to > Cinnamon or whether it was something that only came in after the fork > point. gnome-shell needed a rebuild because exposed it its own typelib file a symbol that was previously exposed by `Gio` and that is now moved to `GioUnix`, so without a rebuild, the typelib was still referring to `Gio`. > If Cinnamon won't need a rebuild then that simplifies things a > lot. No rebuild needed. Confirmed.
