On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 03:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>But why should it be omitted? I think moving it to info should be good
>enough to do here -- we would like to encourage maintainers to move to
>a newer watch version eventually.
It’s likely fatal if they upgrade prematurely, though.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this?
AFAIU, the lintian version that's released to unstable isn't targeted
for packages in stable.
I (very candidly) don't understand why Trixie not supporting d/watch v5
is causing issues? Please be more verbose so we can address this issue :)
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ [email protected] / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄
