Hi, On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 03:59:41PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I don't find the .openpgp extension choice to be great. It is very long, > it is going to be confusing alongside the pre-existing usage of .pgp for > binary artifacts, and it ignores the existing usage of .asc. I could > agree that «.asc» was not a great choice (given its potentially generic > naming), but I think it's pretty ubiquitously recognized as OpenPGP ASCII > Armor by now. > > I'd rather we do not make this even more confusing. :/
I agree. For someone who used PGP already in the previous millenium, .asc obviously means ascii armor. But I don't really care what you chose, I reported the bug only because the usage was inconsistent and I found it confusing. I am sorry that this is wasting so much of your time. thanks, Christian
