Hello, On Fri 05 Sep 2025 at 03:36pm +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1111331: git-debpush: check if CI passed before
> tagging"):
>> So far we are reusing debian/source/options for 1.0 and are planning to
>> use some of debian/gbp.conf. But having our own file would be okay.
>> (And dpkg is newly complaining about our new of d/s/options, so, we
>> might want to move that.)
>
> I do think we want our own file. (The things we put in d/s/options
> ought to be there still I think.)
>
>> How about debian/git-debpush.ini ?
>
> Can I galk you into TOML ?
Thinking about it a little more systematically ISTM that some good
criteria might be:
- similar to other stuff in debian/
I think that means deb822 (control), ini (gbp.conf) or unsectioned
line-based (debhelper configs).
- easy to parse enough for how git-debpush is a shell script.
I'm not sure TOML fits these criteria.
But maybe you could share why you like it?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
