On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 08:02:05AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 22.08.25 13:00, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 09:16:12AM +0000, Graham Inggs wrote: > > > Just an update: libxml2-16, libxslt and libxmlsec1-1 have all > > > migrated. There are a couple of binNMUs still building, but now it's > > > just a matter of fixing or removing the remaining packages. > > > ... > > > > Is there a reason why src:libxml2.9 exists, instead of just having a > > cruft library in testing as with other transitions? > > > > If there is not, an RC bug might autoremove it back out of testing. > > > > At some point removal would then also be good, since it confuses the > > BTS in two ways: > > - bugs reported against the binary package libxml2 in stable might > > show up at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libxml2.9 > > - src:foo and existing but foo built from src:bar is not handled well > > the libxml.so.2 is part of the LSB standard.
We removed support for the obsolete LSB standard in stretch. cu Adrian
