On 2025-08-22 13:34:17 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hello, > > > On Aug 22, 2025, at 1:26 PM, Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > On 2025-08-13 17:40:26 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >>> On 13-08-2025 16:28, Simon McVittie wrote: > >>> Now that forky is open, would it be possible to start removing armel > >>> from the lists of architectures that "matter"? > >> > >> > >> We're intending to remove armel from testing soon. I seem to recall there > >> was a reason why we might want to keep it longer during the cycle, but I > >> can't recollect the reason and I can't seem to find it in my inbox (might > >> have been on IRC or IRL. If nobody can reproduce the reason, we'll probably > >> act within a couple of days/weeks. It already came up on IRC this week. > > > > I intend to merge > > https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/tree/armel-removal by > > the end of August and will then ask FTP to remove armel from forky. > > Could we add loong64 while we’re at it?
No. loong64 doesn't even exist in unstable yet. That needs to be taken care of first. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
