Source: patroni
Version: 4.0.6-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

I'm currently working on updating the etcd-server package from 3.5.16 -> 
3.5.22, and
have uploaded the result to debian/experimental. The new package brings a 
number of
upstream bugfixes, and I'd like to upload it to sid.


While testing reverse dependencies, I've noticed that the autopkgtest in the 
patroni
package fail when building against that new version of etcd:

1269s autopkgtest [12:08:51]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary
1269s test                 PASS
1269s acceptance-etcd3-basic FAIL non-zero exit status 1
1269s acceptance-etcd3-full FAIL non-zero exit status 1
1269s acceptance-etcd-basic PASS
1269s acceptance-zookeeper-basic PASS
1269s acceptance-raft-basic PASS


This seems to happen on all architectures, here are the logs for amd64 and i386:

https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/patroni/unstable/i386//63284595/
https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/patroni/unstable/amd64//63284593/


I'm having a really hard time reading the output of the tests. It seems that
autopkgtest is executing behavioral tests using the python "behave" package, 
which
I'm unfamiliar with. Please assist with diagnosing this issue and let me know
if that is an issue with the test or a regression in the etcd package.


BTW, I've noticed this failure using debusine, cf
https://debusine.debian.net/debian/developers/work-request/132304/ it
seems that all other reverse depends pass, with the exception of
vip-manager2, which I'm going to look at next.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.12.38+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Reply via email to