Hi D
Sorry for the late reply. I don't know if we can reproduce this anymore.
Is it possible, that you ran apt-show-versions as a non root user after doing the apt-get update? Mayby the package cache was not uptodate?
Can you still reproduce the problem?
Christoph
D Goel schrieb:
The package below is clearly upgradeable, yet apt-show-versions tells me it is uptodate: Bcc: D Goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:54:07 -0400
Package: apt-show-versions Version: 0.07 Followup-For: Bug #234704
bluefish/testing uptodate 0.13-0.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy bluefish bluefish: Installed: 0.13-0.1 Candidate: 0.13-1 Version Table: 0.13-1 0 500 http://ftp.debian.org testing/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages -40 http://ftp.debian.org unstable/main Packages -40 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages *** 0.13-0.1 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.7-1 0 500 http://ftp.debian.org stable/main Packages 500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org stable/main Packages
-- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages apt-show-versions depends on: ii apt 0.5.27 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.12 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii perl [libstorable-perl] 5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
-- ============================================================================ Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature