Hi D

Sorry for the late reply. I don't know if we can reproduce this anymore.

Is it possible, that you ran apt-show-versions as a non root user after
doing the apt-get update? Mayby the package cache was not uptodate?

Can you still reproduce the problem?

Christoph

D Goel schrieb:
The package below is clearly upgradeable, yet apt-show-versions tells me it is 
uptodate:
Bcc: D Goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:54:07 -0400

Package: apt-show-versions
Version: 0.07
Followup-For: Bug #234704

 bluefish/testing uptodate 0.13-0.1

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy bluefish
bluefish:
  Installed: 0.13-0.1
  Candidate: 0.13-1
  Version Table:
     0.13-1 0
        500 http://ftp.debian.org testing/main Packages
        500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages
        -40 http://ftp.debian.org unstable/main Packages
        -40 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
 *** 0.13-0.1 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.7-1 0
        500 http://ftp.debian.org stable/main Packages
        500 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org stable/main Packages


-- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages apt-show-versions depends on:
ii  apt                           0.5.27     Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libapt-pkg-perl               0.1.12     Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl [libstorable-perl]       5.8.4-2    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction

-- no debconf information



--
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



Reply via email to