On Saturday, May 17, 2025 12:25:31 AM CEST Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > And these private packets are fully compliant. It is in the spec after > > all. > > What is in the spec? Public key packets are *also* in the spec, but > they don't belong in a detached signature, which is what is described > here. Nothing in any OpenPGP specification i've ever read suggests that > arbitrary packets can be included in any position in a detached > signature.
Now that sequoia also thinks that having non-critical packets anywhere, can we also let GnuPG do it, right ? right ? https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia/-/issues/1193#note_2522532582 /Sune -- I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world. And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist. - zefrank
