On 23/05/25 at 09:09 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Control: severity -1 normal > > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 08:51:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: reproc > > Version: 14.2.5-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: FTBFS > > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: ftbfs-20250520 ftbfs-trixie > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed > > to build on i386. > > The version in trixie did not build on i386, so this is not a > regression. > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=reproc&arch=i386
Ah, I see. In that specific case, 14.2.5-1 (in trixie) does _not_ have binaries for i386 14.2.5-2 (in unstabler) does have binaries for i386 My filter was "does it have i386 binaries in unstable", that's why I filed that bug. Lucas
