to 22.5.2025 klo 21.18 Louis-Philippe Véronneau ([email protected]) kirjoitti: > > On 2025-05-22 1 h 02 p.m., Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > to 22.5.2025 klo 16.51 Louis-Philippe Véronneau ([email protected]) > > kirjoitti: > >> Bug #1105037 in lintian reported by you has been fixed in the > >> Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit > >> message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: > >> > >> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/bff519e31ffab9dddb074357b8975f9b246b4605 > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Downgrade non-virtual-facility-in-initd-script to warning > >> > >> As pointed in the bug report, the tag says this SHOULD be done, not that > >> it MUST. > >> > >> Closes: #1105037 > > > > Can you point to a Policy item that is phrased as SHOULD or SHOULD NOT for > > this? > > > > Martin-Éric > > > > I do not, but then again not all Lintian tags have to be backed by > Policy items. Some are also simply good practices that have been > recommended for a while. > > This tag has been around since 2009 (implemented in > d187e5b9bf8a319b757afc4d299835f41f18b5e5) and if you wish for us to > reconsider its existence, we would need other arguments than just not > being based on a Policy item.
I don't question the tag's existence. I question a severity level that is not backed by Policy. Martin-Éric
