> I imagine something like this (inspired by the recent #374049):
>
>
> d-shlibs/d-devlibdeps \
> --override 's/libstdc++6-dev// # BUG#374049' \
> --override 's/libstdc++5-dev// # BUG#374049 with sarge backport' \
> debian/mp4-0-dev.substvars debian/tmp/usr/lib/libmp4av.so \
> debian/tmp/usr/lib/libmpeg4ip_gnu.so \
> debian/tmp/usr/lib/libmp4v2.so
>
> Also the files debian/d-shlibs-overrides and
> debian/$PACKAGE.d-shlibs-overrides could be consulted as well.
>
> Please not the support for comments. I believe sed supports this already
> but if my memory is wrong then a simple grep in front of it would do the
> trick.
>
> The regexes would need to be used _before_ hardcoded ones, I believe, in
> order to be able to possibly override existing ones. But I am not quite
> sure about that.
>
> The use of such overrides is of course discouraged - it would be much
> better if the tool itself contained support for all possible scenarios.
> I suggest the use of overrides should trigger a notice (which also lists
> all comments, if any) promoting to file wishlist bugreports :-)
>
>
> How does this sound?
Sounds like a great plan, especially because we'll then have a
debugged snippet to add to the hardcoded list.
Do you have an implementation handy ?
I imagine using shell arrays to hold the parameter and doing a loop.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]