Hi Santiago and Michael On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 00:03, Santiago Vila <sanv...@debian.org> wrote: > If it's a matter of uploading the current version in experimental > to unstable, I'd prefer Graham to do it, since he is the one who > authored the experimental versions.
No, that was Michael. I did look at uploading 2024.05.001-2 to unstable. It doesn't appear to start a library transition, and gpaw continues to work with the new version. I was concerned about the apparent breakage caused in cp2k, with which I am not familiar. This showed up in the pseudo-excuses for elpa in experimental [1]. > On the other hand, if this is not expected to happen, then I'd like > to have your permission to fix this based on the current version > (say, in a branch called trixie and versioned 2022.11.001-4), that > can be merged back to master at a later time. I'd prefer MIchael to go ahead with 2024.05.001-2 to unstable, but I'm also happy to upload 2022.11.001-4 which I was working on previously. Regards Graham [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=elpa&experimental=1
