On 2025-04-07 18:56:41 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > While I don't have any specific disagreement with anything you say here, I'm > reluctant to unilaterally revert what was apparently a deliberate change in > response to a user request (see https://bugs.debian.org/944469) so close to > the trixie freeze, particularly when I've really just been doing drive-by > maintenance of this package.
Well, the user request in 944469 was for bash only, and no-one requested such completions for zsh. > Could you please file a separate bug report about this, and CC the reporter > and fixer of #944469? We can then discuss whether e.g. the completions are > appropriate for bash but not zsh, or should be made non-default again across > the board, or something else. Bug filed as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102340 -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
