Package: lintian
Version: 2.121.2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

The groff linting is coming up with false positives because man pages are
checking (presumably) without enabling the 'tbl' preprocessor.

An example, running:

  apt-get source libcrypt-dev
  cd libxcrypt-4.4.38
  debuild -i -uc -us -b

Gives:

Now running lintian libxcrypt_4.4.38-1_amd64.changes ...
W: libcrypt-dev: groff-message troff:<standard input>:101: warning: macro 'TE' 
not defined [usr/share/man/man3/crypt_checksalt.3.gz:2]
W: libcrypt-dev: groff-message troff:<standard input>:246: warning: macro 'TS' 
not defined [usr/share/man/man3/crypt_gensalt.3.gz:1]
W: libcrypt-dev: groff-message troff:<standard input>:258: warning: macro 'TE' 
not defined [usr/share/man/man3/crypt_gensalt.3.gz:2]
W: libcrypt-dev: groff-message troff:<standard input>:429: warning: macro 'TS' 
not defined [usr/share/man/man3/crypt.3.gz:1]
W: libcrypt-dev: groff-message troff:<standard input>:442: warning: macro 'TE' 
not defined [usr/share/man/man3/crypt.3.gz:2]
W: libcrypt-dev: groff-message troff:<standard input>:55: warning: macro 'TS' 
not defined [usr/share/man/man3/crypt_preferred_method.3.gz:1]
W: libcrypt-dev: groff-message troff:<standard input>:63: warning: macro 'TE' 
not defined [usr/share/man/man3/crypt_preferred_method.3.gz:2]
W: libcrypt-dev: groff-message troff:<standard input>:93: warning: macro 'TS' 
not defined [usr/share/man/man3/crypt_checksalt.3.gz:1]
Finished running lintian.

But the mdoc-format man page, e.g. man crypt, is fine and renders its table as
expected.

Should the groff invocation in lintian be updated with -t?

Thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.12.19-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Reply via email to