to 20.3.2025 klo 7.33 Maytham Alsudany (mayt...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > > On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 07:04 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > It's not just that it's a false positive. It's also marked at priority Error > > without pointing to a specific MUST or MUST NOT item in Debian Policy. > > #796660.
Which is merely a proposal at this point. That doesn't justify the check already having Error priority. > > Sorry, but a check that doesn't point to a specific policy item is just > > someone's pet peve. That qualifies as Pedantic or Experimental at best. > > Most packages shouldn't be shipping binaries from other architectures, > and Lintian is designed to check for common mistakes as well, not *just* > policy items. Oh totally, I agree, but until it has become a policy item AND the corresponding Lintian check has been thoroughly debugged, it has no place as an Error. Martin-Éric
