On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:21:53 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

[...]
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Is there any chance to see the three files included in the
> > 'linux-cpupower' package?
[...]
> Let me try to quickly summarize the status here (don't shoot the
> messenger):
> 
> From a src:linux maintenance point of view I think we would still
> continue to decline shipping some scripts in packages produced, but
> there might be a chance we ship them if they are maintained upstream
> as examples (FWIW, this is very similar argument as it holds for which
> patches we accept to cherry-pick, only what is reviewed and accepted
> upstream and is applied in at least a upper version)
> 
> My proposal to you would be: Do upstream the scripts as part of the
> tools/power/cpupower source. If they get accepted we might include them
> as part of upstream as well in the produced packages.

Hello Salvatore,
thanks for your followup.

I can try, hoping that the answer won't be "this is a job for distros,
not for upstream!"...

Where do I start from?
By sending a message to the [linux-pm] mailing list?

[linux-pm]: <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/>

Please let me know, thanks for your time.


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgp25WHJ2grS_.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to