* Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <jo...@debian.org> [2025-03-16 22:41]:
Hi,Quoting Santiago Vila (2025-03-16 22:20:37)Regarding fakeroot, I was really thinking about packages that might rely on fakeroot being present, but in a way not related with dpkg or rules-requires-root, i.e. imagine a package doing this in the build target, either directly or indirectly: fakeroot tar czvf some-artifact.tar.gz sometree My concern here is that by dropping fakeroot from the chroot, we may uncover some missing build-depends, similar to what it happened with tzdata some time ago. I guess the only way to see if there are any packages doing that is by actually trying to build them without fakeroot, so that's what I will probably do and will let you know how it goes...yes, I expect there to be quite a number of packages that need fakeroot during the build but forgot to declare an explicit Build-Depends on it because it used to be always installed until recently.
I have filled most of those already, also those for missing apt and ca-certificates/openssl dependencies as we see all of those from reproduce.debian.net. But happy to get a second test :).
Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
