On June 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Interesting. Can you try installing pcscd and see if it changes the
> behavior at all.
Yep. installing pcscd makes the error message go away. And removing
it makes the message come back. However, libpam-p11 appears to work
properly for me without the daemon, and i guess i'd rather have a bit
of noise during PAM sessions, rather than run a superfluouse daemon as
root. But neither would be best, of course.
Should i be running pcscd? Am i using an unsupported configuration?
Should libpam-p11 actually depend on pcscd? i still don't understand
the architecture well enough to know just what pcscd is supposed to
do, and what features i'm missing by not running it.
Thanks for looking into this, Eric.
--dkg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
