Quoting Peter Green (2025-02-18 23:17:12) > On 18/02/2025 21:58, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Peter Green (2025-02-18 22:15:14) > >> Package: rust-mail-send > >> > >> I hope to update rustls-native-certs to 0.8 soon. > >> > >> I see that the version in experimental already uses rustls-native-certs 0.8 > >> but it also uses a newer version of tokio-rustls, which I think it makes > >> sense to keep as a seperate update. > >> > >> I've prepared a debdiff against the version in sid to support > >> rustls-native-certs 0.8, the change is pretty trivial. > > I don't understand: I maintain rustls-native-certs, not you, so what is > > it that you are saying? Do you intend on hijacking the package? > > Sorry! > > I started out looking at rustls-pemfile, which we would really > like to get upgraded (see > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096190 ) > and when I started looking through the rdeps it looked like > rustls-pemfile and rustls-native-certs were closely related > enough that they should probably be handled together. > > but I failed to notice that rustls-native-certs was one of > your packages and not a rust team package.
Understandable confusion. I would love to get rustls-native-certs upgraded, and am happy for help doing it, but think that it will require fixing each reverse dependency first - which was possibly also the exact thing you were doing here. Instead of patching to use newer rustls-native-certs, the upstream recommendation is to instead move to rustls-platform-verifier. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
